Anticipazioni del prossimo numero
Abstract
This paper critically addresses - with reference to both the procedure in general and the tender procedures - the issue of the revocability of the RUP and the methods with which such an act can be adopted. Public contracts are the area in which replacement is most used, as demonstrated by the practice constituting the starting point of the investigation. After an analysis of the positive, jurisprudential and ANAC opinion framework on the matter, the main constitutive elements of the appointment of the RUP are identified and the position of the figure - hybrid between organization and administrative activities - and its ontological anchoring to responsibility are identified in order to propose indications - among other things - on the essential contents of the contrarius actus of his revocation and on the competence to issue the respective act.
Full Text
PDFRiferimenti bibliografici
I contenuti redazionali di questo sito sono distribuiti con una licenza Creative Commons, Attribuzione - Condividi allo stesso modo 3.0 Italia (CC BY-SA 3.0 IT) eccetto dove diversamente specificato. Diretta da G. Terracciano, G. Mazzei, J. Espartero Casado. Direttore Responsabile: G. Caputi. Redazione: C. Rizzo. Iscritta al N. 16/2009 del Reg. stampa del Tribunale di Roma - ISSN 2036-7821